| Section |
|
|
|
Page
No. |
|
| ES |
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY |
ES-1 |
| |
ES.1 |
Purpose
of the EIR/EIS |
ES-1 |
| |
ES.2 |
Introduction
to the Riverside County Integrated Planning Process and Related
Projects |
ES-1 |
| |
ES.3 |
Project
Location |
ES-2 |
| |
ES.4 |
Purpose
and Need |
ES-2 |
| |
ES.5 |
Proposed
Project |
ES-3 |
| |
ES.6 |
Goals
of the MSHCP |
ES-4 |
| |
ES.7 |
Alternatives |
ES-5 |
| |
ES.8 |
Issues
Raised |
ES-7 |
| |
ES.9 |
Summary
of Environmental Impacts/Consequences |
ES-11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 1.0 |
PURPOSE
AND NEED FOR ACTION |
1.1-1 |
| |
1.1 |
Introduction |
1.1-1 |
| |
|
1.1.1 |
Background |
1.1-7 |
| |
|
1.1.2 |
Riverside
County Integrated Project |
1.1-8 |
| |
|
1.1.3 |
Riverside
County Conservation Planning Context |
1.1-11 |
| |
|
1.1.4 |
Regulatory
Context |
1.1-13 |
| |
|
1.1.5 |
Related
Documentation |
1.1-17 |
| |
|
1.1.6 |
Relationship
of the MSHCP to Surrounding HCP/NCCPs |
1.1-18 |
| |
1.2 |
Purpose
and Need for the Proposed Project |
1.2-1 |
| |
|
1.2.1 |
Project
Goals |
1.2-2 |
| |
|
1.2.2 |
Project
Objectives |
1.2-4 |
| |
|
1.2.3 |
Purpose
of the Joint EIS/EIR |
1.2-5 |
| |
1.3 |
Proposed
Action |
1.3-1 |
| |
1.4 |
Actions
Covered (CEQA) and Decisions to Be Made (NEPA) |
1.4-1 |
| |
|
1.4.1 |
U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service |
1.4-2 |
| |
|
1.4.2 |
California
Agencies |
1.4-2 |
| |
|
1.4.3 |
County
of Riverside Agencies |
1.4-2 |
| |
|
1.4.4 |
Local
Jurisdictions |
1.4-2 |
| |
1.5 |
Public
Outreach and Scoping Process |
1.5-1 |
| |
|
1.5.1 |
Public
Outreach |
1.5-1 |
| |
|
1.5.2 |
CEQA/NEPA
Scoping Process |
1.5-2 |
| |
|
1.5.3 |
Notice
of Preparation/Notice of Intent |
1.5-2 |
| |
|
1.5.4 |
Identification
of Potentially Significant Issues |
1.5-3 |
| |
|
1.5.5 |
Issues
Not Considered Significant and Not Selected for Detailed Analysis
|
1.5-5 |
| |
1.6 |
Relevant
Statutes, Regulations, and Guidelines |
1.6-1 |
| |
1.7 |
Organization
of the EIR/EIS |
1.7-1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2.0 |
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION AND DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES |
2.1-1 |
| |
2.1 |
Project
Location |
2.1-2 |
| |
|
2.1.1 |
MSHCP
Plan Area |
2.1-2 |
| |
|
2.1.2 |
Institutional/Political
Framework |
2.1-5 |
| |
|
2.1.3 |
Demographic
Considerations |
2.1-10 |
| |
2.2 |
Identification
of Alternatives and Selection of Proposed Alternative |
2.2-1 |
| |
|
2.2.1 |
Species
Considered for Conservation |
2.2-2 |
| |
|
2.2.2 |
Conceptual
Conservation |
2.2-3 |
| |
2.3 |
Proposed
Action - MSHCP |
2.3-1 |
| |
|
2.3.1 |
Generalized
Reserve Description |
2.3-1 |
| |
|
2.3.2 |
Soils |
2.3-13 |
| |
|
2.3.3 |
Patch
Size |
2.3-14 |
| |
|
2.3.4 |
Covered
Species |
2.3-15 |
| |
2.4 |
Listed,
Proposed, and Strong Candidate Species Alternative |
2.4-1 |
| |
2.5 |
Listed
and Proposed Species Alternative |
2.5-1 |
| |
2.6 |
Existing
Reserves Alternative |
2.6-1 |
| |
2.7 |
No
Project/No MSHCP Alternative |
2.7-1 |
| |
2.8 |
Alternatives
Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis |
2.8-1 |
| |
|
2.8.1 |
Narrow
Endemic Plant Species Alternative |
2.8-1 |
| |
|
2.8.2 |
Modified
Reserve Configuration Alternative |
2.8-3 |
| |
2.9 |
Funding |
2.9-1 |
| |
2.10 |
Implementation |
2.10-1 |
| |
2.11 |
Covered
Activities |
2.11-1 |
| |
|
2.11.1 |
Compatible
Uses |
2.11-1 |
| |
|
2.11.2 |
Conditionally
Compatible Uses |
2.11-2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 3.0 |
ENVIRONMENTAL
SETTING/AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT |
3.1-1 |
| |
3.1 |
Biological
Resources |
3.1-1 |
| |
|
3.1.1 |
Data
Sources and Limitations |
3.1-1 |
| |
|
3.1.2 |
Bioregions |
3.1-8 |
| |
|
3.1.3 |
Vegetation
Communities |
3.1-11 |
| |
|
3.1.4 |
Species
Considered for Conservation in the Proposed MSHCP |
3.1-21 |
| |
3.2 |
Agricultural
and Extractive Resources |
3.2-1 |
| |
|
3.2.1 |
Agricultural
Resources |
3.2-1 |
| |
|
3.2.2 |
Mineral
Resources within the Proposed MSHCP Area |
3.2-7 |
| |
3.3 |
Population,
Housing, and Employment |
3.3-1 |
| |
|
3.3.1 |
Population |
3.3-1 |
| |
|
3.3.2 |
Housing |
3.3-3 |
| |
|
3.3.3 |
Employment |
3.3-3 |
| |
|
3.3.4 |
Region
and City/County Forecasts |
3.3-4 |
| |
3.4 |
Public
Services (Fire Protection and Parks) |
3.4-1 |
| |
|
3.4.1 |
Fire |
3.4-1 |
| |
|
3.4.2 |
Planned
Park Facilities with the Proposed MSHCP Plan Area |
3.4-5 |
| |
3.5 |
Transportation
and Circulation |
3.5-1 |
| |
|
3.5.1 |
Existing
Transportation/Circulation Conditions |
3.5-1 |
| |
|
3.5.2 |
Existing
Street and Highway System |
3.5-2 |
| |
|
3.5.3 |
Existing
Public Transportation Systems/Services |
3.5-29 |
| |
|
3.5.4 |
Existing
Rail Transportation System |
3.5-31 |
| |
|
3.5.5 |
Existing
Non-Motorized Systems |
3.5-32 |
| |
|
3.5.6 |
Major
Utility Corridors |
3.5-34 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 4.0 |
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES |
4.1-1 |
| |
4.1 |
Biological
Resouces |
4.1-2 |
| |
|
4.1.1 |
Introduction |
4.1-2 |
| |
|
4.1.2 |
Assumptions |
4.1-10 |
| |
|
4.1.3 |
Thresholds
of Significance/Criteria for Determining Significance |
4.1-11 |
| |
|
4.1.4 |
Impacts |
4.1-12 |
| |
|
4.1.5 |
Mitigation
Measures |
4.1-159 |
| |
|
4.1.6 |
Level
of Significance after Mitigation |
4.1-159 |
| |
4.2 |
Agricultural
and Extractive Resources |
4.2-1 |
| |
|
4.2.1 |
Agricultural
Resources |
4.2-1 |
| |
|
4.2.2 |
Mineral
Resources |
4.2-15 |
| |
4.3 |
Population,
Housing, and Employment |
4.3-1 |
| |
|
4.3.1 |
Introduction |
4.3-1 |
| |
|
4.3.2 |
Criteria
for Determining Significance |
4.3-2 |
| |
|
4.3.3 |
Impacts
Analysis |
4.3-2 |
| |
|
4.3.4 |
Mitigation
Measures |
4.3-7 |
| |
|
4.3.5 |
Significance
of Impacts after Mitigation |
4.3-7 |
| |
4.4 |
Public
Services (Fire Protection and Parks) |
4.4-1 |
| |
|
4.4.1 |
Impact
Analysis Considerations and Assumptions |
4.4-1 |
| |
|
4.4.2 |
Thresholds
of Significance/Criteria for Determining Significance |
4.4-1 |
| |
|
4.4.3 |
Impacts |
4.4-1 |
| |
|
4.4.4 |
Mitigation
Measures |
4.4-5 |
| |
|
4.4.5 |
Level
of Significance after Mitigation |
4.4-5 |
| |
4.5 |
Transportation
and Circulation |
4.5-1 |
| |
|
4.5.1 |
Introduction |
4.5-1 |
| |
|
4.5.2 |
Thresholds
of Significance/Criteria for Determining Significance |
4.5-1 |
| |
|
4.5.3 |
Impacts |
4.5-1 |
| |
|
4.5.4 |
Mitigation
Measures |
4.5-5 |
| |
|
4.5.5 |
Level
of Significance after Mitigation |
4.5-5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 5.0 |
CUMULATIVE
IMPACTS |
5.1-1 |
| |
5.1 |
Cumulative
Impact Analysis |
5.1-6 |
| |
|
5.1.1 |
Biological
Resources |
5.1-6 |
| |
|
5.1.2 |
Agriculture
and Extractive Resources |
5.1-8 |
| |
|
5.1.3 |
Housing,
Population, and Employment |
5.1-9 |
| |
|
5.1.4 |
Public
Services |
5.1-10 |
| |
|
5.1.5 |
Transportation |
5.1-10 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 6.0 |
ADDITIONAL
TOPICS REQUIRED BY CEQA AND NEPA |
6.1-1 |
| |
6.1 |
California
Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy
Act |
6.1-1 |
| |
|
6.1.1 |
California
Environmental Quality Act |
6.1-1 |
| |
|
6.1.2 |
National
Environmental Policy Act |
6.1-1 |
| |
|
6.1.3 |
Discussion
of Issues Required by CEQA and NEPA |
6.1-2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 7.0 |
ORGANIZATIONS
AND PERSONS CONSULTED |
7.1-1 |
| |
7.1 |
County |
7.1-1 |
| |
7.2 |
Cities |
7.1-1 |
| |
7.3 |
Regional
Agencies |
7.1-2 |
| |
7.4 |
Consulting
Firms |
7.1-2 |
| |
|
|
|
| 8.0 |
REPORT
PREPARATION PERSONNEL |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.1 |
LSA
Associates, Inc. |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.2 |
County
of Riverside |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.3 |
Best,
Best, and Krieger |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.4 |
United
States Fish and Wildlife Service |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.5 |
California
Department of Fish and Game |
8.1-1 |
| |
8.6 |
DUDEK
& Associates, Inc. |
8.1-1 |
| |
|
|
|
| 9.0 |
REFERENCES |
9.1-1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 10.0 |
GLOSSARY,
ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND INDEX |
10.1-1 |
| |
10.1 |
Glossary |
10.1-1 |
| |
10.2 |
Acronyms
and Abbreviations |
10.2-1 |
| |
10.3 |
General
Index |
10.3-1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
APPENDICES |
| |
| Appendix
A |
Scoping
Report; Notices; Mailing Lists; Responses; News Articles |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Appendix
B |
Alternatives
Screening Report |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| LIST
OF FIGURES |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 1.1 |
|
MSHCP
Regional Location |
1.1-3 |
| 1.2 |
|
MSHCP
Plan Areas - Incorporated Cities |
1.1-5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2.1 |
|
Existing
Land Use |
2.1-3 |
| 2.2 |
|
Criteria
Area Boundaries |
2.1-7 |
| 2.3 |
|
Status
of Land Ownership |
2.3-5 |
| 2.4 |
|
Bio-regions
in the MSHCP Plan Area |
2.3-9 |
| 2.5 |
|
Vegetation
Types in Western Riverside County |
2.3-11 |
| 2.6 |
|
Listed,
Proposed, and Strong Candidate Species Alternative |
2.4-7 |
| 2.7 |
|
Listed
and Proposed Species Alternative |
2.5-3 |
| 2.8 |
|
Existing
Reserves Alternative |
2.6-9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 3.1.1 |
|
Areas
Within the MSHCP Plan Area Potentially Affected by Existing
State and Federal Wetlands Regulations |
3.1-5 |
| 3.2.1 |
|
Farmland
Resources |
3.2-3 |
| 3.2.2 |
|
Mineral
Resources |
3.2-11 |
| 3.5.1 |
|
Existing
Roadways |
3.5-3 |
| 3.5.2a |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service Northwest
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-11 |
| 3.5.2b |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service North-Central
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-13 |
| 3.5.2c |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service Northeast
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-15 |
| 3.5.2d |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service Central-Eastern
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-17 |
| 3.5.2e |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service Southwest
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-19 |
| 3.5.2f |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service South-Central
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-21 |
| 3.5.2g |
|
Existing
Conditions Roadway Classification and Level of Service Southeast
MSHCP Plan Area |
3.5-23 |
| 3.5.3 |
|
Utilities |
3.5-35 |
| |
|
|
|
| 4.1.1 |
|
MSHCP
Vegetation Map |
4.1-3 |
| 4.1.2 |
|
Regional
MSHCP Context |
4.1-7 |
| 4.1.3 |
|
Schematic
Cores and Linkages Map |
4.1-101 |
| |
|
|
|
| LIST
OF TABLES |
| |
|
|
|
|
| ES-A |
|
Summary
of Alternatives |
ES-9 |
| ES-B |
|
Summary
of Significance of Impacts after incorporation of Mitigation
Measures |
ES-13 |
| |
|
|
|
| 1A |
|
Decisions/Actions
by Lead and Responsible Agencies |
1.4-1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2A |
|
Land
Distribution by Jurisdiction |
2.1-5 |
| 2B |
|
Planned
Land Uses within Unincorporated County Land |
2.1-9 |
| 2C |
|
Planned
Land Uses within Incorporated Land |
2.1-9 |
| 2D |
|
Existing
vs. Planned Land Use within Western Riverside County |
2.1-10 |
| 2E |
|
Number
of Species Considered for Conservation under the MSHCP since
1999 |
2.2-2 |
| 2F |
|
Estimate
for Conservation by Vegetation Community (Proposed MSHCP) |
2.3-13 |
| 2G |
|
Species
Conserved by the MSHCP |
2.3-15 |
| 2H |
|
Listed,
Proposed, and Strong Candidate Species Alternative Species List |
2.4-1 |
| 2I |
|
Listed,
Proposed, and Strong Candidate Species Alternative Vegetation
Summary |
2.4-6 |
| 2J |
|
Listed
and Proposed Species Alternative Vegetation Summary |
2.5-1 |
| 2K |
|
Existing
Reserves Alternative Vegetation Summary |
2.6-1 |
| 2L |
|
Summary
of Potential Species Conservation under Existing Reserves Alternative |
2.6-2 |
| 2M |
|
Summary
of Existing Reserves within the Proposed MSHCP Plan Area |
2.7-2 |
| 2N |
|
Existing
Species Provided Protection within the Proposed MSHCP Plan Area |
2.7-5 |
| 2O |
|
Plant
Species Protected under the Narrow Endemic Species Alternative |
2.8-2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 3A |
|
Summary
of Collapsed and Uncollapsed Vegetation Communities Classifications |
3.1-11 |
| 3B |
|
Acreage
and Proportional Distribution of Vegetation Communities within
the Proposed MSHCP Plan Area |
3.1-13 |
| 3C |
|
State
Designated Farmland within Western Riverside County (Acres) |
3.2-6 |
| 3D |
|
Existing
Agricultural Use in Western Riverside County |
3.2-7 |
| 3E |
|
Mineral
Production in Riverside County |
3.2-8 |
| 3F |
|
MRZ-2
Land within the Proposed MSHCP Plan Area |
|